Not always.
You'll remember the Brooks Air Force Drug Lab, August 2002, flawed analysis of a known quality assurance sample. Although the facts of this flaw are now successfully suppressed in drug urinalysis cases - despite continued reference to the "gold standard," i.e. perfect testing process, in trial, in briefings, and in military media.
You'll remember that USACIL successfully covered up a rogue DNA examiner's errors - and then put him back to doing the same testing. And he did it again, and then they tell people.
WELCOME TO DCFL (the DEFENSE COMPUTER FORENSICS LABORATORY).
They -- well, feel free to read the LETTER.
You need an expert in computer cases, just like you need one in drug cases and other forensics related cases.
06 November 2007
Trial Practice Note: Should you trust DOD/Military Labs
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

0 comments:
Post a Comment